{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"missouri-public-service-commission","displayName":"Missouri Public Service Commission","totalCases":14},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd83067:2020-04-21","opinionId":"2615c9d9-d364-536d-b134-1629b9f4f928","slug":"in-the-matter-of-the-petition-of-missouri-american-water-company-for-appr-d83067","caseName":"in the Matter of the Petition of Missouri-American Water Company for Approval to Change an Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge\nvs.\nMissouri Public Service Commission","caseNumber":"WD83067","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2020-04-21","year":2020,"display_summary":"Missouri-American Water Company appealed a Public Service Commission order approving a change to its infrastructure system replacement surcharge (ISRS). The company challenged the Commission's exclusion of estimated net operating loss (NOL) from the ISRS calculation, arguing it violated statutory requirements and IRS regulations. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's order, finding no error in its decision to exclude the estimated NOL.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","other","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=154940","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-matter-of-the-petition-of-missouri-american-water-company-for-appr-d83067","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd82532:2019-11-19","opinionId":"28c86945-83a7-5c19-b340-f588cf5e4e67","slug":"in-the-matter-of-the-application-of-rate-increase-request-for-liberty-uti-d82532","caseName":"In the Matter of the Application of Rate Increase Request for Liberty Utilities (Missouri Water), LLC d/b/a Liberty Utilities; Orange Lake Country Club, Inc., and Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.\nvs.\nMissouri Public Service Commission","caseNumber":"WD82532","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2019-11-19","year":2019,"display_summary":"Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. and Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. appealed a Missouri Public Service Commission (PSC) order approving water and sewer utility rate increases for Liberty Utilities (Missouri Water) LLC. Orange Lake challenged the lawfulness of the PSC's Small Utility Rate Case Procedure (SURP), Liberty's qualification as a small utility, and the PSC's evidentiary rulings regarding expert testimony. The appellate court affirmed the PSC's order, finding the SURP lawful, the PSC's interpretation of \"customer\" reasonable, and no abuse of discretion in the evidentiary rulings.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","civil-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=146439","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-matter-of-the-application-of-rate-increase-request-for-liberty-uti-d82532","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":4,"source":"text","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc96222:2018-07-03","opinionId":"7682d6e8-6e34-50bb-8829-4b5c0399f928","slug":"missouri-public-service-commission-respondent-v-union-electric-company-db-c96222","caseName":"Missouri Public Service Commission, Respondent, vs. Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC96222","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2018-07-03","year":2018,"display_summary":"The Missouri Public Service Commission granted Staff's motion for summary determination, finding Union Electric Co. (Ameren) violated a Commission rule by failing to use updated 2014 data to calculate its \"net shared benefits\" under an energy-efficiency plan. Ameren appealed, arguing the Commission misinterpreted the term \"methodology\" in Rule 20.093(1)(F) and that its approved Plan did not require such updates. The Missouri Supreme Court reversed, holding that \"methodology\" refers only to the formula, not the values of variables, and that the Plan unambiguously did not require updating avoided costs estimates.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","civil-procedure","standard-of-review","contracts"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=127316","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-public-service-commission-respondent-v-union-electric-company-db-c96222","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"insurance-bad-faith","label":"Insurance Bad Faith","href":"/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith"},{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd79406:2016-12-06","opinionId":"e3659f57-68df-505e-8932-7c6cad0cb56a","slug":"missouri-public-service-commission-v-union-electric-company-dba-ameren-mi-d79406","caseName":"Missouri Public Service Commission\nvs.\nUnion Electric Company, D/B/A Ameren Missouri","caseNumber":"WD79406","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2016-12-06","year":2016,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"modified","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=108056","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-public-service-commission-v-union-electric-company-dba-ameren-mi-d79406","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"insurance-bad-faith","label":"Insurance Bad Faith","href":"/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:parent-105533","opinionId":"a863efc0-102e-582c-880b-149cdfefd382","slug":"in-the-matter-of-kansas-city-power-light-companys-request-for-authority-t-d79125","caseName":"In the Matter of Kansas City Power & Light Company's Request for Authority to Implement a General Rate Increase for Electric Service and Midwest Energy Consumers' Group\nvs.\nMissouri Public Service Commission","caseNumber":"WD79125","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2016-09-06","year":2016,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=105533","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-matter-of-kansas-city-power-light-companys-request-for-authority-t-d79125","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd74714:2012-09-18","opinionId":"8d51dcb4-fa8f-5719-aec1-28bec9db0c35","slug":"office-of-public-counsel-v-missouri-public-service-commission-d74714","caseName":"Office of Public Counsel vs. Missouri Public Service Commission","caseNumber":"WD74714","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2012-09-18","year":2012,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=56787","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/office-of-public-counsel-v-missouri-public-service-commission-d74714","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"mo:sc91968:2012-04-17","opinionId":"f3409ccb-dc03-5a4e-b4df-ce330640b85c","slug":"state-of-missouri-ex-rel-mogas-pipeline-llc-respondent-v-missouri-public-c91968","caseName":"State of Missouri ex rel. MoGas Pipeline LLC, Respondent vs. Missouri Public Service Commission, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC91968","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2012-04-17","year":2012,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=53680","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-ex-rel-mogas-pipeline-llc-respondent-v-missouri-public-c91968","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd73913:2011-12-06","opinionId":"8135024b-82d6-5d1c-84be-2503f5e99f90","slug":"charles-a-harter-v-missouri-public-service-commission-d73913","caseName":"Charles A. Harter vs. Missouri Public Service Commission","caseNumber":"WD73913","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2011-12-06","year":2011,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=51092","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/charles-a-harter-v-missouri-public-service-commission-d73913","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd72355:2011-06-28","opinionId":"c0194d1a-1d4b-591b-8444-3299ca8e5d3e","slug":"state-of-missouri-ex-rel-mogas-pipeline-llc-v-missouri-public-service-com-d72355","caseName":"State of Missouri, ex rel., MoGas Pipeline LLC vs. Missouri Public Service Commission","caseNumber":"WD72355","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2011-06-28","year":2011,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=47529","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-ex-rel-mogas-pipeline-llc-v-missouri-public-service-com-d72355","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd70299:2010-02-09","opinionId":"95a95ca6-e992-505b-9780-dfaedd6643e2","slug":"missouri-public-service-commission-v-hurricane-deck-holding-company-d70299","caseName":"Missouri Public Service Commission vs. Hurricane Deck Holding Company","caseNumber":"WD70299","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2010-02-09","year":2010,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=36937","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-public-service-commission-v-hurricane-deck-holding-company-d70299","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd70666:2009-12-08","opinionId":"0ef6c8bb-33c2-5f6a-943d-25fcf0f7a708","slug":"missouri-public-service-commission-v-oneok-inc-et-al-d70666","caseName":"Missouri Public Service Commission vs. Oneok, Inc., et al.","caseNumber":"WD70666","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2009-12-08","year":2009,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=35899","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-public-service-commission-v-oneok-inc-et-al-d70666","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"personal-injury","label":"Personal Injury","href":"/practice-areas/personal-injury","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd70219:2009-06-23","opinionId":"bb419741-99d9-5cfb-8fb7-c4e021c6f8a9","slug":"state-of-missouri-ex-rel-public-counsel-atmos-energy-corporation-v-missou-d70219","caseName":"State of Missouri, ex rel. Public Counsel, Atmos Energy Corporation vs. Missouri Public Service Commission","caseNumber":"WD70219","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2009-06-23","year":2009,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=32826","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-ex-rel-public-counsel-atmos-energy-corporation-v-missou-d70219","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"corporate","label":"Corporate Law","href":"/practice-areas/corporate","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd69976:2009-05-26","opinionId":"4a99e427-56e2-55ef-be87-5765ca967f60","slug":"state-of-missouri-ex-rel-bps-telephone-company-et-al-respondents-uscoc-of-d69976","caseName":"State of Missouri, ex rel BPS Telephone Company, et al.; Respondents, USCOC of Greater Missouri, LLC d/b/a US Cellular, Appellant, vs. Missouri Public Service Commission, Respondent","caseNumber":"WD69976","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2009-05-26","year":2009,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=32109","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-ex-rel-bps-telephone-company-et-al-respondents-uscoc-of-d69976","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"insurance-bad-faith","label":"Insurance Bad Faith","href":"/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith","score":20,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappwd:wd68506:undated","opinionId":"a519cde0-1018-5893-89d4-857061ffe9a8","slug":"missouri-public-service-commission-appellant-v-missouri-interstate-gas-ll-d68506","caseName":"Missouri Public Service Commission, Appellant v. Missouri Interstate Gas, LLC, et al., Respondent.","caseNumber":"WD68506","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":null,"year":2008,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=21236","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/missouri-public-service-commission-appellant-v-missouri-interstate-gas-ll-d68506","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"appellant"}]}