{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"priorities-usa-et-al","displayName":"Priorities USA, et al.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"mo:sc97470:2020-01-14","opinionId":"325d7738-c02d-5200-9c3c-681240bdfdd2","slug":"priorities-usa-et-al-respondents-v-state-of-missouri-et-al-appellants-c97470","caseName":"Priorities USA, et al., Respondents, vs. State of Missouri, et al., Appellants.","caseNumber":"SC97470","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2020-01-14","year":2020,"display_summary":"Priorities USA and other respondents challenged Missouri's voter identification law, section 115.427, arguing its affidavit requirement unconstitutionally burdened the right to vote. The circuit court found the affidavit requirement unconstitutional and enjoined its enforcement, as well as the dissemination of misleading voter materials. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the affidavit was contradictory and misleading, and that the circuit court's injunctions were proper.","primaryTopic":"other","topicSlugs":["other","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=148515","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/priorities-usa-et-al-respondents-v-state-of-missouri-et-al-appellants-c97470","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}