{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"ray-james-juniel","displayName":"Ray James Juniel","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd81227:2019-02-13","opinionId":"a830bc84-490d-5022-8315-2bf7d4393b92","slug":"state-of-missouri-v-ray-james-juniel-d81227","caseName":"State of Missouri\nvs.\nRay James Juniel","caseNumber":"WD81227","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2019-02-13","year":2019,"display_summary":"Ray James Juniel appealed his convictions for statutory rape, statutory sodomy, and endangering the welfare of a child, arguing that the trial court violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The delay between his initial indictment and trial was 866 days. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, concluding that despite the presumptively prejudicial delay, the balance of the Barker factors did not establish a speedy trial violation, as much of the delay was attributable to Juniel or neutral reasons, and actual prejudice was minimal.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=136674","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-v-ray-james-juniel-d81227","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}