{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"raymond-spencer-hood-movant","displayName":"RAYMOND SPENCER HOOD, Movant-","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd36370:2020-09-24","opinionId":"7d0452ab-30b2-547b-a0de-5d68b37c1900","slug":"raymond-spencer-hood-movant-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-resp-d36370","caseName":"RAYMOND SPENCER HOOD, Movant-Appellant\nv.\nSTATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent","caseNumber":"SD36370","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2020-09-24","year":2020,"display_summary":"Raymond Spencer Hood appealed the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Hood claimed his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting to propensity evidence and for not advising him on the appellate standard of review after waiving a jury trial. The appellate court affirmed the denial, finding no clear error and deferring to the motion court's credibility findings regarding counsel's advice.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","evidence","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=166654","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/raymond-spencer-hood-movant-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-resp-d36370","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}