{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"santonio-mccoy","displayName":"Santonio McCoy","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed110900:2023-09-19","opinionId":"d90dc0c3-a3ec-5a50-b750-9922db3f5e45","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-santonio-mccoy-appellant-110900","caseName":"State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Santonio McCoy, Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED110900","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2023-09-19","year":2023,"display_summary":"Santonio McCoy was convicted of first-degree child molestation after a jury trial. On appeal, McCoy challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to prove intent, the admission of expert testimony regarding a Children's Advocacy Center interview, and the State's alleged knowing use of perjured testimony. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding sufficient evidence of intent and declining to review the other points due to procedural deficiencies, including multifariousness and lack of preservation.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","evidence","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"affirmed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=201218","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-santonio-mccoy-appellant-110900","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}