{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"shawn-w-yount","displayName":"Shawn W. Yount","totalCases":3},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd37629:2024-05-23","opinionId":"c5563e2f-07d4-5855-9b03-6d6a32783e5c","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-shawn-w-yount-appellant-d37629","caseName":"STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent\nv.\nSHAWN W. YOUNT, Appellant","caseNumber":"SD37629","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2024-05-23","year":2024,"display_summary":"Shawn Yount, a prior and persistent offender, was convicted of felony stealing and four counts of second-degree burglary. On appeal, Yount challenged the sufficiency of evidence for one burglary charge, the denial of his motions to disqualify the prosecutor and a juror, and the accuracy of the written judgment regarding sentencing. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding sufficient evidence for burglary, no abuse of discretion in denying the disqualification motions, and no prejudicial error in the written judgment's omission of a concurrent sentence order.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","evidence","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=208354","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-shawn-w-yount-appellant-d37629","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"mo:sc99317:2022-04-05","opinionId":"6ede612c-804d-540b-9c0b-822de664429f","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-shawn-w-yount-appellant-c99317","caseName":"State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Shawn W. Yount, Appellant.","caseNumber":"SC99317","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2022-04-05","year":2022,"display_summary":"Shawn W. Yount appealed the circuit court's judgment finding him to be a dangerous offender, arguing the State failed to plead and prove all essential facts for the sentencing enhancement. Yount was convicted of four counts of second-degree burglary and sentenced to an enhanced term of 30 years imprisonment. The Missouri Supreme Court reversed, holding that the statutory definition of \"dangerous offender\" requires the State to satisfy both subdivisions (1) and (2) of section 558.016.4, as the word \"and\" is not interchangeable with \"or\" in this context. Since the State only satisfied one subdivision, the circuit court plainly erred in applying the enhancement, and the case was remanded for resentencing.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=185985","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-shawn-w-yount-appellant-c99317","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":32,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed108967:2021-09-28","opinionId":"03c1db23-ede6-5fb2-a6c4-71a8fd34f928","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-shawn-w-yount-appellant-108967","caseName":"State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Shawn W. Yount, Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED108967","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2021-09-28","year":2021,"display_summary":"Shawn W. Yount appealed his conviction for four counts of second-degree burglary and his thirty-year sentence as a dangerous offender. The appellate court found no error in the admission of text message evidence, affirming that portion of the judgment. However, the court found plain error in Yount's sentencing as a dangerous offender, concluding the State failed to plead and prove all statutory requirements. Due to a conflict between the plain meaning of the dangerous offender statute and a Missouri Approved Charges-Criminal Note on Use, the court transferred the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure","evidence","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=180874","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-shawn-w-yount-appellant-108967","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":40,"source":"tag","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}