{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"smaila-mujakic","displayName":"Smaila Mujakic","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed110805:2023-03-21","opinionId":"7ae98610-d54c-5a23-bb02-3ae8aade5928","slug":"smaila-mujakic-appellant-v-division-of-employment-security-respondent-110805","caseName":"Smaila Mujakic, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED110805","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2023-03-21","year":2023,"display_summary":"Smaila Mujakic appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision, which affirmed the Appeals Tribunal's finding that she failed to show good cause for her untimely appeal of an unemployment benefits overpayment determination. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's decision. It held that the statutory \"good cause\" exception for extending the appeal filing period does not apply to non-fraudulent overpayment determinations, despite expressing sympathy for the claimant's situation.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=193477","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/smaila-mujakic-appellant-v-division-of-employment-security-respondent-110805","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"employment","label":"Employment Law","href":"/practice-areas/employment","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: employment"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}