{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"stacey-im-morehead","displayName":"Stacey I.M. Morehead","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd82925:2020-10-06","opinionId":"8e155f06-fc58-5b02-9156-dd7a83e5abc6","slug":"stacey-im-morehead-v-state-of-missouri-d82925","caseName":"Stacey I.M. Morehead\nvs. \nState of Missouri","caseNumber":"WD82925","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2020-10-06","year":2020,"display_summary":"Stacey Morehead appealed the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The appellate court, however, determined that her motion was untimely. It held that the 180-day time limit for filing such motions begins when a movant is first delivered to the Department of Corrections for a Court Ordered Detention Sanction (CODS) program, even if it is a condition of probation. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and remanded the case with directions to the motion court to dismiss Morehead's motion as untimely.","primaryTopic":"criminal-procedure","topicSlugs":["criminal-procedure","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"remanded","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=167094","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/stacey-im-morehead-v-state-of-missouri-d82925","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: conviction","text: probation"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}