{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"state-of-missouri-et-al-respondents/cross","displayName":"State of Missouri, et al., Respondents/Cross-","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"mo:sc101308:2026-01-23","opinionId":"3e87fbd8-6c3b-5141-ac25-289beec22fdf","slug":"sean-soendker-nicholson-appellantcross-respondent-v-state-of-missouri-et-101308","caseName":"Sean Soendker Nicholson, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, vs. State of Missouri, et al., Respondents/Cross-Appellants.","caseNumber":"SC101308","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":"2026-01-23","year":2026,"display_summary":"Sean Soendker Nicholson sued the State of Missouri, challenging the constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 22, alleging violations of the original purpose, single subject, and clear title provisions of the Missouri Constitution. The circuit court found SB 22 constitutional regarding these procedural limitations but unconstitutional on equal protection grounds for one section, which it severed. On appeal, the Missouri Supreme Court reversed, holding that SB 22 violated the original purpose requirement because an amendment granting the attorney general new appeal powers was not germane to the bill's original purpose concerning ballot summaries. The Court further found the offending provision could not be severed, thus invalidating SB 22 in its entirety.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","civil-procedure","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=230206","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/sean-soendker-nicholson-appellantcross-respondent-v-state-of-missouri-et-101308","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"},{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":4,"source":"text","url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"}],"role":"appellant"},{"caseId":"mo:sc88476:undated","opinionId":"31a5c374-5ef7-58ce-9c52-f3c0e4bbc6d3","slug":"james-trout-appellantcross-respondent-v-state-of-missouri-et-al-responden-c88476","caseName":"James Trout, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. State of Missouri, et al., Respondents/Cross-Appellants.","caseNumber":"SC88476","court":"mo","courtLabel":"Supreme Court of Missouri","decisionDate":null,"year":2007,"display_summary":null,"primaryTopic":null,"topicSlugs":[],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=26596","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/james-trout-appellantcross-respondent-v-state-of-missouri-et-al-responden-c88476","relatedPracticeAreas":[],"role":"appellant"}]}