{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"steve-cox","displayName":"Steve Cox","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd81748:2019-02-13","opinionId":"3eb4e687-4b98-5382-9231-50db28ff736b","slug":"steve-cox-v-city-of-chillicothe-and-rick-knouse-d81748","caseName":"Steve Cox\nvs.\nCity of Chillicothe and Rick Knouse","caseNumber":"WD81748","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2019-02-13","year":2019,"display_summary":"Steve Cox, the Livingston County Sheriff, sued the City of Chillicothe and its Chief of Police, Rick Knouse, alleging violations of Missouri's Sunshine Law for disclosing a 911 recording. The Sheriff sought damages under sections 610.150 and 610.100.2, arguing these were incorporated into section 610.021, allowing recovery under section 610.027. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment for the defendants, holding that section 610.027 does not provide a civil remedy for the improper disclosure of records under sections 610.150 or 610.100.2.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","civil-procedure","other"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=136680","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/steve-cox-v-city-of-chillicothe-and-rick-knouse-d81748","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}