{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"sylvia-pauletta-johnson","displayName":"SYLVIA PAULETTA JOHNSON","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd35904:2019-07-09","opinionId":"9c11a277-7f43-58eb-9d7a-d1b1ac12910e","slug":"sylvia-pauletta-johnson-respondent-v-director-of-revenue-appellant-d35904","caseName":"SYLVIA PAULETTA JOHNSON, Respondent\nvs.\nDIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Appellant","caseNumber":"SD35904","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2019-07-09","year":2019,"display_summary":"Sylvia Pauletta Johnson appealed the setting aside of an administrative suspension of her driving privileges for an excessive blood-alcohol level. The trial court found insufficient foundation for the BAC test results, citing multiple tests and lack of implied consent. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that the trial court erred as a matter of law because the blood draw was consensual, not an implied consent/refusal case, and no law limits consensual attempts to obtain a sufficient sample.","primaryTopic":"administrative-law","topicSlugs":["administrative-law","evidence","appellate-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"modified","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=142173","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/sylvia-pauletta-johnson-respondent-v-director-of-revenue-appellant-d35904","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}