{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"tamara-d-tidwell","displayName":"TAMARA D. TIDWELL","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappsd:sd35656:2019-02-04","opinionId":"57e9dd4b-73f6-5c5c-9cb5-645538ba1978","slug":"state-of-missouri-respondent-v-tamara-d-tidwell-appellant-d35656","caseName":"STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent\nvs.\nTAMARA D. TIDWELL, Appellant","caseNumber":"SD35656","court":"moappsd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District","decisionDate":"2019-02-04","year":2019,"display_summary":"Tamara Tidwell appealed the denial of her motion to retax costs, which were imposed as a condition of her probation after a felony conviction. The appellate court determined it lacked jurisdiction to hear a direct appeal from the denial of such a motion, citing established law that there is no right to appeal the terms and conditions of probation. Due to the general interest and importance of the issue, and related pending cases, the court transferred the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","criminal-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=136434","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-tamara-d-tidwell-appellant-d35656","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":40,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law","topic: criminal-procedure","text: state of missouri","text: probation","text: felony"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}