{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"tg","displayName":"T.G.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed109977:2022-06-14","opinionId":"7358fac5-c646-5299-8e97-778f4efc359d","slug":"tg-respondent-v-dwh-appellant-109977","caseName":"T.G., Respondent, v. D.W.H., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED109977","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2022-06-14","year":2022,"display_summary":"D.W.H. appealed a full order of protection granted to T.G. The appellate court dismissed the appeal due to D.W.H.'s failure to comply with multiple appellate briefing standards set forth in Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04. Specifically, D.W.H.'s brief contained a deficient statement of facts that omitted and misrepresented information, an improper and multifarious point relied on that failed to align with Murphy v. Carron standards, and an argument section lacking preservation statements and record citations. The court concluded that these deficiencies prevented meaningful appellate review and declined to act as an advocate for the appellant.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","family-law"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=187414","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/tg-respondent-v-dwh-appellant-109977","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}