{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"tje","displayName":"T.J.E.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed107697:2020-01-14","opinionId":"9841644f-7c00-5a29-8992-bdd9e46fd3e3","slug":"tje-appellant-v-mrm-respondent-107697","caseName":"T.J.E., Appellant, vs. M.R.M., Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED107697","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2020-01-14","year":2020,"display_summary":"Father appealed the trial court's judgment modifying legal custody, physical custody, and child support. The trial court had granted Father's request for a reduction in child support and additional physical custody during the summer, but denied his request for joint legal custody and equal parenting time. The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment, holding that the trial court failed to make statutorily-required findings under section 452.375 RSMo regarding the public policy and best-interest factors for custody determinations.","primaryTopic":"child-custody","topicSlugs":["child-custody","family-law","appellate-procedure","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=148416","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/tje-appellant-v-mrm-respondent-107697","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":38,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: family-law","topic: family-law","topic: child-custody","text: custody","text: child support"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}