{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"tk-mk-and-rr","displayName":"T.K., M.K., and R.R.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappwd:wd85701:2023-04-18","opinionId":"fdfb9d5b-43a0-5c43-9050-a2ba71ab8bd1","slug":"sk-et-al-v-tk-mk-and-rr-d85701","caseName":"S.K., Et al.\nvs.\nT.K., M.K., and R.R.","caseNumber":"WD85701","court":"moappwd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District","decisionDate":"2023-04-18","year":2023,"display_summary":"S.K. appealed the trial court's judgments declaring her and T.K. (her former spouse) as the natural parents of their two children, conceived via artificial insemination with donor sperm. S.K. argued the trial court misapplied the Uniform Parentage Act. The appellate court dismissed the appeals for lack of jurisdiction, finding the judgments were not final because they did not resolve all claims in the petitions, specifically those related to custody, child support, and parenting plans.","primaryTopic":"family-law","topicSlugs":["family-law","appellate-procedure","civil-procedure","child-custody"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=194540","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/sk-et-al-v-tk-mk-and-rr-d85701","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":36,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: family-law","topic: family-law","topic: child-custody","text: custody","text: child support"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}