{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"woodland-lakes-trusteeship-inc","displayName":"Woodland Lakes Trusteeship, Inc.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed107749:2019-11-05","opinionId":"65da0904-33db-5dca-9579-d5e76c8f3fdb","slug":"dave-campbell-and-catrenia-dawn-campbell-appellants-v-woodland-lakes-trus-107749","caseName":"Dave Campbell and Catrenia Dawn Campbell, Appellants, v. Woodland Lakes Trusteeship, Inc., Respondent.","caseNumber":"ED107749","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2019-11-05","year":2019,"display_summary":"Dave and Catrenia Dawn Campbell appealed the trial court's judgment dismissing their second amended petition with prejudice. The appellate court found that the Campbells' pro se brief substantially failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04, including failures to state the standard of review, provide a fair and concise statement of facts, comply with \"Points Relied On\" formatting, and present a legal argument. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal, preserving nothing for review.","primaryTopic":"appellate-procedure","topicSlugs":["appellate-procedure","civil-procedure"],"outcomeNorm":"dismissed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=146293","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dave-campbell-and-catrenia-dawn-campbell-appellants-v-woodland-lakes-trus-107749","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}