{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"yql","displayName":"Y.Q.L.","totalCases":1},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed108207:2020-09-22","opinionId":"5a76197f-bfa4-5a8a-9f3f-f49a8bb301ba","slug":"nc-respondent-v-yql-appellant-108207","caseName":"N.C., Respondent, vs. Y.Q.L., Appellant.","caseNumber":"ED108207","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2020-09-22","year":2020,"display_summary":"N.C. sought a full order of protection against Y.Q.L., her former psychiatric patient, alleging stalking. The trial court granted the order, finding Y.Q.L. engaged in repeated, purposeful, and unwanted contact that was subjectively and objectively alarming to N.C. On appeal, Y.Q.L. argued there was insufficient evidence to prove his conduct served no legitimate purpose and caused N.C. alarm. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding ample evidence supported all elements of stalking under § 455.010.","primaryTopic":"family-law","topicSlugs":["family-law","appellate-procedure","standard-of-review","evidence"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=166355","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/nc-respondent-v-yql-appellant-108207","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"family","label":"Family Law","href":"/practice-areas/family","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: family-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/family"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: evidence","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"appellant"}]}