{"disclaimer":"This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source.","party":{"slug":"zachary-jacobsen-et-al","displayName":"Zachary Jacobsen, et al","totalCases":2},"cases":[{"caseId":"moappd:ed111782:2024-03-12","opinionId":"df8ae341-3f63-58f4-b2d3-008024affd96","slug":"dennis-laramore-appellant-v-zachary-jacobsen-et-al-respondents-111782","caseName":"Dennis Laramore, Appellant, vs. Zachary Jacobsen, et al., Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED111782","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2024-03-12","year":2024,"display_summary":"Dennis Laramore filed a replevin petition seeking the return of items seized during a search warrant. The trial court granted summary judgment for the respondent officers, finding Laramore's claim time-barred. On appeal, the Eastern District reversed and remanded, holding that the respondents' motion for summary judgment was legally defective for failing to attach a statement of uncontroverted material facts as required by Rule 74.04(c)(1). The court did not reach the merits of the statute of limitations issue.","primaryTopic":"civil-procedure","topicSlugs":["civil-procedure","summary-judgment","other"],"outcomeNorm":"mixed","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=206345","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dennis-laramore-appellant-v-zachary-jacobsen-et-al-respondents-111782","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":16,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: summary-judgment","text: summary judgment"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"},{"caseId":"moappd:ed108855:2020-11-17","opinionId":"053b9120-aad1-5d98-8ec8-1799d93d3e04","slug":"dennis-l-laramore-appellant-v-zachary-jacobsen-et-al-respondents-108855","caseName":"Dennis L. Laramore, Appellant, vs. Zachary Jacobsen, et al, Respondents.","caseNumber":"ED108855","court":"moappd","courtLabel":"Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District","decisionDate":"2020-11-17","year":2020,"display_summary":"Dennis Laramore, proceeding pro se, appealed the circuit court's dismissal of his replevin petition against law enforcement officers. The circuit court had dismissed the petition, ruling it was barred by the three-year statute of limitations under section 516.130(1) RSMo, which it determined began to run on the date the property was seized. The appellate court reversed and remanded, agreeing that section 516.130(1) applied but holding that the statute of limitations begins to run when the property is no longer needed as evidence, not on the date of seizure.","primaryTopic":"civil-procedure","topicSlugs":["civil-procedure","property-real-estate","appellate-procedure","governmental-immunity"],"outcomeNorm":"unknown","officialSourceUrl":"https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=169199","detailUrl":"https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dennis-l-laramore-appellant-v-zachary-jacobsen-et-al-respondents-108855","relatedPracticeAreas":[{"slug":"criminal-law","label":"Criminal Law","href":"/practice-areas/criminal-law","score":20,"source":"tag","evidence":["tag: criminal-law"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law"},{"slug":"real-estate","label":"Real Estate","href":"/practice-areas/real-estate","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: property-real-estate"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate"},{"slug":"litigation","label":"Civil Litigation","href":"/practice-areas/litigation","score":12,"source":"topic","evidence":["topic: civil-procedure","topic: appellate-procedure"],"url":"https://ott.law/practice-areas/litigation"}],"role":"respondent"}]}