Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Court Rule

Rule 84.04

This authority appears in 2,357 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
rule:84.04
Citation Sample
Rule 84.04
Cases Shown
50
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationCriminal LawFamily LawReal EstateEmployment LawCorporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to Rule 84.04?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free Litigation ConsultationCall About A Litigation Claim

Citation Treatment

cited

2,272

followed

85

Cases Citing Rule 84.04

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

cited

Citation: Rule 84.04

The trial court granted summary judgment to the Metzgers on their claim for a prescriptive easement over a portion of a paved driveway between their home and the Morelocks' property. The appellate court affirmed the grant of summary judgment, finding no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Real EstateCivil Litigation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 24, 2026

In re the Marriage of: Stacey L. Noble vs. Bradford R. Noble

cited

Citation: Rule 84.04

Wife appealed the trial court's dissolution judgment, challenging the court's failure to provide a remedy after independent investigation of facts, the use of normalized income to determine husband's maintenance obligation, and the finding that husband lacked ability to pay maintenance. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in all respects.

Family LawCivil Litigation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Feb 10, 2026

M.D.M, Appellant, v. A.W.S., Respondent.

cited

Citation: Rule 84.04

The court affirmed the circuit court's child custody and support judgment, rejecting Father's six points of error regarding the Form 14 calculations, denial of Line 11 credit despite equal visitation time, disproportionate attorney's and GAL fees, and exclusion of testimony on equitable abatement. The appellate court found that Father failed to meet the required analytical standards for challenging the judgment and that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in denying the Line 11 credit and ruling against equitable abatement.

Family LawCivil Litigation