Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Court Rule

Rule 84.14

This authority appears in 511 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
rule:84.14
Citation Sample
Rule 84.14
Cases Shown
50
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationReal EstateFamily LawCriminal LawEmployment LawPersonal Injury

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to Rule 84.14?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free Litigation ConsultationCall About A Litigation Claim

Citation Treatment

cited

501

followed

10

Cases Citing Rule 84.14

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

cited

Citation: Rule 84.14

The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's grant of third-party visitation to Smith under section 452.375.5(5)(a), holding that this statute does not create an independent cause of action for third-party visitation when custody is not at issue. The court determined that Smith lacked standing to seek visitation rights after Martinez was granted full parental rights through adoption.

Family LawCivil Litigation
followed

Citation: Rule 84.14

In this quiet title appeal, the court reversed the trial court's interpretation of an easement deed that the Daumes held over a private roadway. The court rejected the trial court's constructions that the easement's 'non-commercial purposes' limitation prohibited agricultural use and that it was restricted to the Daumes and their immediate family members.

Real EstateCorporate LawCivil Litigation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 29, 2026

Emily Omohundro vs. Denny Hoskins, Missouri Secretary of State, et al.

cited

Citation: Rule 84.14

The court reversed the trial court's approval of the summary statement for an initiative petition seeking to amend the Missouri Constitution to prevent public funds from benefiting nonpublic schools. The court agreed with the appellant that the summary statement was insufficient and unfair, and certified an alternative statement to the Secretary of State for inclusion on the ballot.

Civil Litigation
cited

Citation: Rule 84.14

The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's judgment and held that a 2022 statute prohibiting homeowners' associations from banning solar panel installations applies to preexisting covenants, not just prospective ones. The homeowners' challenge to the HOA's restriction on solar panels visible from the street was successful, as the statute's prohibitions supersede prior restrictive covenants.

Real EstateCorporate LawCivil Litigation