Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Alan Frazier, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Douglas Gonzalez and Marianne Gonzalez, Defendants/Appellants.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/alan-frazier-plaintiffrespondent-v-douglas-gonzalez-and-marianne-gonzalez-12505
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12505
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Alan+Frazier%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Douglas+Gonzalez+and+Marianne+Gonzalez%2C+Defendants%2FAppellants.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Alan Frazier, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Douglas Gonzalez and Marianne Gonzalez, 
Defendants/Appellants.
Case Number:  71436
Handdown Date:  12/16/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Jon Cunningham
Counsel for Appellant:  Gregory D. O'Shea
Counsel for Respondent:  Reginald P. Bodeux
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell, J., and James R. Dowd, J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Defendants appeal judgment of trial court in plaintiff's favor in an unlawful detainer case.   The trial court's 
judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence.  No error of law appears. 
Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.