Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Calvin D. McCormack, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue State of Missouri, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: administrative
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/calvin-d-mccormack-respondent-v-director-of-revenue-state-of-missouri-app-17744
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17744
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Calvin+D.+McCormack%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Director+of+Revenue+State+of+Missouri%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  Calvin D. McCormack, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue State of Missouri, Appellant.
Case Number:  54421
Handdown Date:  04/28/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Vernon E. Scoville
Counsel for Appellant:  Evan J. Buchheim
Counsel for Respondent:  Byron G. Stewart
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Hanna, P.J.; Stith and Smith, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
The Director of Revenue appeals from the trial court's judgment setting aside the Director's ten-year revocation of 
Calvin McCormack's driver's license for driving while intoxicated (DWI).  Finding no precedential value to our decision, we 
affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision.   
Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.