Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Carlos Travis, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/carlos-travis-movantappellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondentrespondent-12740
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12740
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Carlos+Travis%2C+Movant%2FAppellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Carlos Travis, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Case Number:  71919
Handdown Date:  01/13/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. John F. Kintz
Counsel for Appellant:  David C. Hemingway
Counsel for Respondent:  Breck K. Burgess
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Carlos Travis, movant, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an 
evidentiary hearing on the grounds that it was untimely.  The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly 
erroneous.   No error of law appears.   An extended opinion would have no precedential value.   We have, however, 
prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.  We affirm the 
judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.