Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Cheryl Lynn Harris Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/cheryl-lynn-harris-movant-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-17485
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17485
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Cheryl+Lynn+Harris+Movant-Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: state of missouri)

---
## Syllabus

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Cheryl Lynn Harris Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 71902
Handdown Date:  06/10/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Hon. William L. Syler
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ.
Opinion:
ORDER

---

## PER CURIAM.

Cheryl Lynn Harris (Movant) appeals from the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing.  We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without 
merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.  The 
judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.