Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Christopher Gregory, Appellant, State of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/christopher-gregory-appellant-state-of-missouri-respondent-12904
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12904
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Christopher+Gregory%2C+Appellant%2C+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Christopher Gregory, Appellant, State of Missouri, Respondent
Case Number:  72440
Handdown Date:  01/20/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Melvyn W. Wiesman
Counsel for Appellant:  S. Paige Canfield
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J.
Opinion:
ORDER
Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely.  We have reviewed the briefs of the 
parties and the record provided on appeal and we conclude the motion court's finding is not clearly erroneous.  Rule 
24.035(k).  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We have, however, provided a memorandum setting 
forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only.  The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.