Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Christopher Smith, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/christopher-smith-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-12923
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12923
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Christopher+Smith%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Christopher Smith, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  72216 and 72245
Handdown Date:  02/17/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Hon. John W. Grimm
Counsel for Appellant:  Susan McGraugh
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an 
evidentiary hearing.  We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's 
determination is not clearly erroneous.  Rule 24.035(k).  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We 
have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. 
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.