Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: City of Byrnes Mill, Ronald Schmidt and Mary Scheble, Appellants, v. Byrnes Mill 206 Corporation, et al., Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-byrnes-mill-ronald-schmidt-and-mary-scheble-appellants-v-byrnes-m-12978
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12978
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=City+of+Byrnes+Mill%2C+Ronald+Schmidt+and+Mary+Scheble%2C+Appellants%2C+v.+Byrnes+Mill+206+Corporation%2C+et+al.%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)
- Corporate Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=corporate&ott_archive_query=City+of+Byrnes+Mill%2C+Ronald+Schmidt+and+Mary+Scheble%2C+Appellants%2C+v.+Byrnes+Mill+206+Corporation%2C+et+al.%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=6&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+corporation&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: corporate; source: text; score: 6; evidence: text: corporation)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  City of Byrnes Mill, Ronald Schmidt and Mary Scheble, Appellants, v. Byrnes Mill 206 Corporation, et 
al., Respondents.
Case Number:  72357 and 72435
Handdown Date:  02/10/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. John L. Anderson
Counsel for Appellant:  Herbert K. Hoffman
Counsel for Respondent:  Charles F. Dufour, Bradley J. Bakula and C. Finn Sheehan
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
Opinion modified by Court's own motion on March 31, 1998.  This substitution does not constitute a new opinion.
ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment against defendants for malicious prosecution and violations of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 
1983.  There is sufficient evidence to support the judgment.  No error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. 
However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and 
reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
We further grant Byrnes Mill 206 Corporation's motion for attorneys' fees incurred on appeal in the amount of 
$5,466.00.
Separate Opinion:

None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.