Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, v. Woodswether Development, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: real-estate
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-v-woodswether-development-appella-18099
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18099
Related Practice Areas:
- Real Estate: https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=real-estate&ott_archive_query=City+of+Kansas+City%2C+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Woodswether+Development%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+real-estate&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: real-estate; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: real-estate)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent, v. Woodswether Development, Appellant.
Case Number:  54668
Handdown Date:  06/30/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. David Shinn
Counsel for Appellant:  Joseph Borich, III and James Jackson
Counsel for Respondent:  Walter O'Toole, Jr.
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Howard, P.J., Breckenridge and Spinden, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
A jury awarded Woodswether Development $547,000 to compensate it for property which the City of Kansas City 
had condemned.  Woodswether Development appeals.  We affirm the circuit court's judgment.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.