Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Clifford Paul Beckerman, Movant/Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/clifford-paul-beckerman-movantappellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondentres-17688
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17688
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Clifford+Paul+Beckerman%2C+Movant%2FAppellant%2C+vs.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Syllabus

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Clifford Paul Beckerman, Movant/Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 70708
Handdown Date:  05/20/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Perry County, Hon. William L. Syler
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam.
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.
Opinion:

Before:  Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, J., and Gaertner, J.
               O R D E R

---

## PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.  We 
affirm. Findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no 
precedential value.  The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the 
reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.