Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Clyde A. Carpenter, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/clyde-a-carpenter-movantappellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondentresponden-16765
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=16765
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Clyde+A.+Carpenter%2C+Movant%2FAppellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Clyde A. Carpenter, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 70954
Handdown Date:  05/27/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Michael P. David
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam.
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.
Opinion:

Before:  Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, J., and Gaertner, J.
O R D E R
Movant   appeals   the   denial,   without   an   evidentiary   hearing,   of   his   Rule   24.035   motion   for   post-
conviction relief.  We affirm. 
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion 
would have no precedential value.  The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information 
only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.