Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Dana Ivy, Appellant, v. Timothy Pettus, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/dana-ivy-appellant-v-timothy-pettus-respondent-17692
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17692
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Dana+Ivy%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Timothy+Pettus%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Dana Ivy, Appellant, v. Timothy Pettus, Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 70726
Handdown Date:  06/17/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Washington County, Hon. James H. Kelly
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  Before Crane, P.J. and Smith and Pudlowski, JJ.
Opinion:

O R D E R
The judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant is affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.