Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Daniel M. Jackson, Appellant, v. Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/daniel-m-jackson-appellant-v-shop-n-save-warehouse-foods-inc-and-division-17193
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17193
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=Daniel+M.+Jackson%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Shop+%27N+Save+Warehouse+Foods%2C+Inc.%2C+and+Division+of+Employment+Security%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+employment&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: employment)
- Workers' Compensation: https://ott.law/practice-areas/workers-compensation?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=workers-compensation&ott_archive_query=Daniel+M.+Jackson%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Shop+%27N+Save+Warehouse+Foods%2C+Inc.%2C+and+Division+of+Employment+Security%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+labor+and+industrial+relations+commission&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: workers-compensation; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: labor and industrial relations commission)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Daniel M. Jackson, Appellant, v. Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., and Division of Employment 
Security, Respondents.
Case Number:  No. 71399
Handdown Date:  06/24/1997
Appeal From:  Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED. Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ.
Opinion:

O R D E R
Appellant, Daniel M. Jackson, appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission wherein 
the Commission determined appellant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits for five weeks due to 
misconduct connected with his work.  We affirm.  
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the award was supported by sufficient and 
competent evidence, was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply 
the law.   As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 

84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.