Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: David Evans, Appellant, v. Delphine Williams Evans, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: family-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/david-evans-appellant-v-delphine-williams-evans-respondent-12790
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12790
Related Practice Areas:
- Family Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/family?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=family&ott_archive_query=David+Evans%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Delphine+Williams+Evans%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+family-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: family; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: family-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  David Evans, Appellant, v. Delphine Williams Evans, Respondent.
Case Number:  72200
Handdown Date:  02/24/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Thomas Frawley
Counsel for Appellant:  Charles E. Kirksey, Jr.
Counsel for Respondent:  Armeta D. Cotten
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J., Crandall and Karohl, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Opinion modified by Court's own motion on March 10, 1998.  This substitution does not constitute a new 
opinion.
Appellant, David Evans, appeals from a judgment of legal separation.  Appellant contends the trial court erred in 
ordering him to pay to Delphine Williams Evans  maintenance for support and for her education.
No   jurisprudential   purpose   would   be   served   by   a   written   opinion.     The   trial   court's   judgment   is   supported   by 
substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. 
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). 
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.