Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Donald H. Brancato, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. St. Louis Community College at Florissant Valley, Respondents/Defendants.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/donald-h-brancato-appellantplaintiff-v-st-louis-community-college-at-flor-17412
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17412
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Donald+H.+Brancato%2C+Appellant%2FPlaintiff%2C+v.+St.+Louis+Community+College+at+Florissant+Valley%2C+Respondents%2FDefendants.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Donald H. Brancato, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. St. Louis Community College at Florissant Valley, 
Respondents/Defendants.
Case Number:  No. 71710
Handdown Date:  05/06/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Kenneth M. Weinstock
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED. Before Clifford H. Ahrens, C.J., William H. Crandall Jr., J., and Charles B. Blackmar, Sr. 
J.
Opinion:

ORDER
Plaintiff, Donald Brancato, appeals from a directed verdict entered in favor of defendant, St. Louis 
Community College at Forest Park (hereinafter College) and from a judgment entered in favor of defendant, 
Richard Booker, upon a jury verdict.  We affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.  However, the parties have been 
furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this 
order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b) 
Separate Opinion:

None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.