Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Edward Brewer, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/edward-brewer-respondent-v-director-of-revenue-state-of-missouri-appellan-17126
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17126
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Edward+Brewer%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Director+of+Revenue%2C+State+of+Missouri%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=6&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: text; score: 6; evidence: text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Edward Brewer, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Appellant.
Case Number:  No. 71332
Handdown Date:  06/27/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Robert M. Heller
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ.
Opinion:

O R D E R 
Appellant, the Director of Revenue for the State of Missouri, appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. 
Louis County setting aside the suspension of respondent, Edward Brewer's, driving privileges.  We affirm.
We have reviewed appellant's brief and the legal file and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by 
substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law.  As 
no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 
84.16(b). 
Separate Opinion:
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.