Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Edwin Minner, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/edwin-minner-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-12702
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12702
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Edwin+Minner%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Edwin Minner, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  71672
Handdown Date:  11/25/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Hon. John W. Grimm
Counsel for Appellant:  Susan McGraugh
Counsel for Respondent:  Breck K. Burgess
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant, Edwin Minner, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County denying his Rule 
24.035 motion as untimely filed.  We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court's ruling is not clearly 
erroneous.  The time limits of Rule 24.035 are valid, mandatory and reasonable.  Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 
(Mo.banc 1989).  An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.  We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 
84.16(b). 
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.