Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Esse Cooper, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/esse-cooper-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-12819
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12819
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Esse+Cooper%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Esse Cooper, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  71988
Handdown Date:  03/10/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. David C. Mason
Counsel for Appellant:  John M. Schilmoeller
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris, III and Cristi A. Ingalsbe
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
Esse Gordon, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. 
We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous.  Rule 
24.035(k).  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion 
setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only.  We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.