Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Fred Wilkinson, Jr., Appellant, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/fred-wilkinson-jr-appellant-v-city-of-kansas-city-missouri-respondent-17999
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17999
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=Fred+Wilkinson%2C+Jr.%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+City+of+Kansas+City%2C+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+termination%3B+text%3A+employment&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: termination, text: employment)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  Fred Wilkinson, Jr., Appellant, v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 53396
Handdown Date:  07/08/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Jon Reginald Gray
Counsel for Appellant:  Michael G. Newbold
Counsel for Respondent:  Kathleen A. Hauser
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  Before Ulrich, C.J., P.J.; Hanna,and Smith, JJ.
Opinion:
ORDER
Fred Wilkinson, Jr. appeals the judgment of the circuit court affirming the decision of the Personnel Appeals Board 
of Kansas City (Board) sustaining the suspension and termination of his employment with the City of Kansas City (City).  
Mr. Wilkinson claims that the Board's decision was unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, was arbitrary, 
capricious, and unreasonable, and was an abuse of discretion. 
The judgment of the circuit court upholding the Board's decision is affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.