Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Galen Punzo, Respondent, v. Robert E. Gardner, Defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/galen-punzo-respondent-v-robert-e-gardner-defendant-burlington-northern-r-18275
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18275
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Galen+Punzo%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Robert+E.+Gardner%2C+Defendant%2C+Burlington+Northern+Railroad+Company%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  Galen Punzo, Respondent, v. Robert E. Gardner, Defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, 
Appellant.
Case Number:  53089
Handdown Date:  10/28/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Hon. Randall R. Jackson
Counsel for Appellant:  Daniel Hamann
Counsel for Respondent:  William McIntosh
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Howard, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, JJ.
Opinion:
ORDER
Burlington Northern Railroad Company appeals a jury verdict and judgment against it in the amount of $650,000 
for plaintiff's injuries.  We conclude that a published opinion would have no precedential value.  Affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b) 
V.A.M.R.
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.