Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Gary Gandy, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/gary-gandy-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-12492
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12492
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Gary+Gandy%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=24&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 24; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Gary Gandy, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  71356
Handdown Date:  10/21/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Booker T. Shaw
Counsel for Appellant:  Dave Hemingway
Counsel for Respondent:  Jill Lahue
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J. and Crandall and Karohl, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
O R D E R 
Defendant, Gary Gandy, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. 
An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.