Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Gerald Geiler, Appellant, v. James Schlereth and Anna Schlereth, Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: real-estate
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/gerald-geiler-appellant-v-james-schlereth-and-anna-schlereth-respondents-12868
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12868
Related Practice Areas:
- Real Estate: https://ott.law/practice-areas/real-estate?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=real-estate&ott_archive_query=Gerald+Geiler%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+James+Schlereth+and+Anna+Schlereth%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+real-estate&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: real-estate; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: real-estate)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Gerald Geiler, Appellant, v. James Schlereth and Anna Schlereth, Respondents.
Case Number:  72092 and 72141
Handdown Date:  11/04/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Hon. Dennis J. Kehm
Counsel for Appellant:  George B. McElroy
Counsel for Respondent:  Mark D. Waldemer
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant, Gerald Geiler, filed a petition to set aside a collector's deed issued to James and Anna Schlereth 
(Respondents).   Appellant alleged he had a valid interest in the property and had timely redeemed such property. 
Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss alleging, inter alia, Appellant had failed to state a cause of action. 
The trial court sustained Respondents' motion and Appellant appealed.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.  However, the parties have been furnished with a 
memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.