Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: G.W. Medical Publishing, Inc., Appellant, v. Antoinett Muldoon and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/gw-medical-publishing-inc-appellant-v-antoinett-muldoon-and-division-of-e-17275
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17275
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=G.W.+Medical+Publishing%2C+Inc.%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Antoinett+Muldoon+and+Division+of+Employment+Security%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=6&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+employment&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: text; score: 6; evidence: text: employment)

---
## Syllabus

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  G.W. Medical Publishing, Inc., Appellant, v. Antoinett Muldoon and Division of Employment Security, 
Respondents. 
Case Number:  No. 71562
Handdown Date:  05/27/1997
Appeal From:  Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam.
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.
Opinion:

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ.
ORDER

---

## PER CURIAM.

G.W. Medical Publishing, Inc., appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations 
Commission which affirmed the dismissal of its prior appeal by the Appeals Referee of the Missouri Division of 
Employment Security.  We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of 
error to be without merit.  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  The judgment of the trial 
court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.