Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: In the Interest of:  H.J.C., a minor child, W.M.J., Appellant, v. K.A.L. a/k/a K.A.A., Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-interest-of-hjc-a-minor-child-wmj-appellant-v-kal-aka-kaa-responde-17204
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17204

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  In the Interest of:  H.J.C., a minor child, W.M.J., Appellant, v. K.A.L. a/k/a K.A.A., Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 71467
Handdown Date:  08/26/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. James J. Gallagher
Counsel for Appellant:  Connie S. Hood
Counsel for Respondent:  Rita M. Montgomery
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P. J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, JJ., concur.
Opinion:

O R D E R
W.M.J., appeals from the judgment of the trial court which terminated her parental rights and granted a decree of 
adoption whereby H.J.C. became the lawful child of K.A.L.  The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not 
against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.