Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: In the Interest of J.A. and A.A., Minor Children/Respondents, v. D.C., Natural Mother/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/in-the-interest-of-ja-and-aa-minor-childrenrespondents-v-dc-natural-mothe-12958
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12958

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  In the Interest of J.A. and A.A., Minor Children/Respondents, v. D.C., Natural Mother/Appellant.
Case Number:  72308
Handdown Date:  03/03/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Frank A. Conard
Counsel for Appellant:  John J. Smith
Counsel for Respondent:  Brent L. Martin
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
Mother appeals from two judgments terminating her parental rights to her children, J.A. and A.A.  We find the 
judgments are supported by substantial evidence, are not against the weight of the evidence, and do not erroneously 
declare or apply the law.  Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). 
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. 
However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this 
order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.