Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: James Young, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dennis Schoemehl and John McHugh, Defendants/Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: corporate
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/james-young-plaintiffappellant-v-dennis-schoemehl-and-john-mchugh-defenda-13252
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13252
Related Practice Areas:
- Corporate Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=corporate&ott_archive_query=James+Young%2C+Plaintiff%2FAppellant%2C+v.+Dennis+Schoemehl+and+John+McHugh%2C+Defendants%2FRespondents.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+corporate&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: corporate; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: corporate)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  James Young, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dennis Schoemehl and John McHugh, Defendants/Respondents.
Case Number:  72895 & 72885
Handdown Date:  05/05/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Robert Lee Campbell
Counsel for Appellant:  Robert Schultz
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Hessel, Thomas P. Berra, Jr., and Paul J. Schulte
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Plaintiff filed a two-count petition against defendants alleging breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract. 
Defendants' filed a summary judgment motion, which the trial court granted.
Plaintiff appeals; we affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.  However, the parties have been furnished with a 
memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.  The judgment is affirmed 
pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.