Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Jeffrey Massey, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/jeffrey-massey-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-13442
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13442
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Jeffrey+Massey%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: criminal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Jeffrey Massey, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  73603
Handdown Date:  09/15/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Joan M. Burger
Counsel for Appellant:  Elizabeth Haines
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  J. Dowd, P.J., Crahan and Teitelman, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Jeffrey Massey (Movant) pleaded guilty to first degree robbery, armed criminal action and attempted kidnapping. 
He filed a Rule 24.035 motion, which was amended by appointed counsel.  The motion court denied his motion without a 
hearing.  Movant appeals from this judgment, contending he is entitled to a hearing on his allegation that his counsel was 
ineffective for failing to adequately consult with him and prepare a defense for him.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is 
not clearly erroneous.  Rule 24.035(k).  Movant's allegations are conclusively refuted by the guilty plea transcript.  Rule 
24.035(h).  Furthermore, Movant completely fails to allege facts entitling him to relief.  Tolen v. State, 934 S.W.2d 639, 641 
(Mo. App. E.D. 1996).  An extended opinion would have no precedential or jurisprudential value.  We affirm the judgment 
pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:

None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.