Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: John Bicknese, d/b/a Little John Marine Service, Inc., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tom Sagehorn, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-bicknese-dba-little-john-marine-service-inc-plaintiffrespondent-v-to-13286
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13286
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=John+Bicknese%2C+d%2Fb%2Fa+Little+John+Marine+Service%2C+Inc.%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Tom+Sagehorn%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  John Bicknese, d/b/a Little John Marine Service, Inc., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tom Sagehorn, 
Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  73229
Handdown Date:  10/27/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Ellsworth Cundiff
Counsel for Appellant:  Anthony L. Anderson
Counsel for Respondent:  Ronald E. Fox, Andrew R. Kasnetz and Jonathan H. Garside
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Hoff, P.J.,  Gaertner and Russell, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Lessee appeals from a judgment entered against him in an action on account.  No error of law appears.  A written 
opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.  However, the 
parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.