Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: John E. Pfeiffer, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/john-e-pfeiffer-movantappellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondentrespondent-17265
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17265
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=John+E.+Pfeiffer%2C+Movant%2FAppellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  John E. Pfeiffer, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 71524
Handdown Date:  09/09/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Larry L. Kendrick
Counsel for Appellant:  Dave Hemingway
Counsel for Respondent:  Jacqueline K. Hamra
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Reinhard, P.J., Karohl and Dowd, Jr., JJ., concur.
Opinion:
DIVISION SIX
O R D E R
Movant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for  post-conviction relief.  We affirm. 
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no 
precedential value.   The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the 
reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.