Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text Official source remains authoritative. Case: Lamont McClain, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District Decision Date: Unknown Outcome: affirmed Practice Area: criminal-law Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/lamont-mcclain-movantappellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-12873 Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12873 Related Practice Areas: - Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Lamont+McClain%2C+Movant%2FAppellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction) --- ## Opinion This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Lamont McClain, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 72391 Handdown Date: 04/28/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Sherri B. Sullivan Counsel for Appellant: Raymund J. Capelovitch Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Karen L. Kramer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Lamont McClain, Movant, appeals judgment entered denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. We affirm. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and concluded the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). A published opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b)(2). We have provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only. Judgment affirmed. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.