Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Lamont Washington, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/lamont-washington-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-13116
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13116
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Lamont+Washington%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Lamont Washington, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  72636
Handdown Date:  03/17/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Hon. Robert H. Dierker, Jr.
Counsel for Appellant:  Dave Hemingway
Counsel for Respondent:  Elizabeth Ziegler
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely.  We have 
reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's determination is not clearly 
erroneous.  Rule 24.035(k).  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We have, however, prepared a 
memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.  We affirm the judgment 
pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.